Claude and Codex, under legal control.
For firms where the early adopters already know what works. ogram foundation brings Claude and Codex into matter work with privacy, governance, and firm-specific configuration.
One required field. We respond through a controlled channel.
Claude and Codex, made operational.
Frontier platforms are already in the hands of serious professionals. ogram foundation turns that informal use into a configured operating perimeter.
Claude
Structured use for long documents, client material, diligence packs, correspondence, and professional memoranda.
Codex
Firm-specific automations, data preparation, workflow tools, and controlled access to internal systems.
Matter workflows, not generic prompts.
The diagnostic starts with the work lawyers actually repeat, then maps where frontier platforms can operate without breaking privilege, source discipline, or firm process.
Matter review
Long-form reading across correspondence, contracts, exhibits, and factual chronologies.
Due diligence
Source-grounded synthesis of virtual data-room material and issue lists.
Precedent memos
Reusable reasoning patterns around the firm's preferred standards and language.
Redlines
Controlled drafting support for clause comparison, markups, and negotiation notes.
Closing checklists
Condition tracking, responsibility mapping, and evidence-backed status summaries.
Mapped to the legal document estate.
No connector is assumed before the diagnostic. The page names connector categories that matter to legal work and keeps exact integration claims behind confirmation.
DMS category
iManage / NetDocuments-class systems, subject to confirmed access and permissions.
Data rooms
Mandate-level document sets, Q&A exports, disclosure schedules, and evidence folders.
SharePoint / drive
Firm-controlled folders, templates, research notes, and working documents.
Email / calendar
Matter correspondence, timetable context, and meeting preparation where permitted.
Knowledge base
Precedents, playbooks, clause banks, and internal standards of proof.
The legal and technical perimeter comes first.
The campaign promise is not generic adoption. It is adoption under a defensible operating model: DPA, retention policy, residency, auditability, and source boundaries mapped before scale.
DPA path
The data-processing position is clarified before production use, with firm obligations reflected in the engagement.
ZDR policy
Zero-retention requirements are mapped at platform and workflow level before sensitive work is introduced.
Model portability
Claude and Codex are integrated without making the firm dependent on a single provider or closed workflow.
Start with a legal AI diagnostic.
A controlled review of matters, systems, permissions, and privacy obligations before any platform is embedded.
Request diagnostic
One required field. We respond through a controlled channel.